PM Lee has declared making the purchase of annuities compulsory. As with many others, I really do not see why the government has to hold my money and pay me till aged 85. I am in favor of medisave though, great plan I feel.
Let’s look at annuities. All CPF contributors have a buy annuities with money from the minimum sum at withdrawal age. The ‘gahment’ has said it will be a fraction, not the whole 99k. You will still get your payouts till your min sum has run out, and when that happens, the annuitity kicks in till you die, paying about half of what you would get from your cpf payout perhaps?
CPF members will start contributing to this ‘pool’ of money. Should you die before aged 85 before your annuity kicks in for you, that pool of money will be used to support others who are still alive. This is the part I feel very strongly against. They said everyone should be responsible for themselves. Now, my money is being taken away from me unwillingly to support a pool of people? WHY?
Also, eligible age to withdrawal your CPF will be increased. So this is what I get
- The gahment holds MY money for even LONGER. God knows if even live to 65 which will be the new age
- I pay money to support this annuity ‘pool’. Isn’t this like welfare schemes in other countries?!?!
- If I die ‘prematurely’, my ‘vested’ money supports others instead. This means my family will inherit substantially lesser out of my CPF, which a big fraction of it going to the public. WTF.
As if it is not enough, as one forumer pointed out, the middle class and upper class is a widening gap too. It comes to a point where young professionals should not earn too much. The low income have PLENTY of housing benefits. But once you earn enough (couples a combined income of 8k, which is rather easy to achieve isn’t it?) are rich enough to be excluded from housing grants, rebates etc, yet they pay more income taxes compared to the lower income, yet get no benefits! No benefits, and you have to take up bank loans because HDB is not going to subsidise your loan if you earn higher than the cap.
I think this is ridiculous. I guess in Singapore, either you be very poor, or very rich. If you are very rich, you don’t care about annuities or loans. You pay cash for every damn thing because you can BLOODY AFFORD it. If you are poor, you get grants and guess what, a low income person can afford a 5-room HDB flat. Can you imagine that?So be poor, get subsidised for everything and why not. You pay easily 50-80k lesser than your middle class counter parts going for the same flat.
Suddenly I feel very unhappy with all these changes. Seriously, it is true isn’t it? Gahment give you 1%, but they take back 3% and even that 1% is LOCKED IN. During elections and GST hikes etc, they promised the middle class will not be left out. But look at what is happening?
I still can’t believe the pool of money shit in annuities. It sounds so much like the swiss fraud thing. Oh yeh did I mention? If you want a HIGHER payout for your annuity at age 85, you need to pay HIGHER premiums. This is like, I take $1 from you and will give you back 50c in time. If you want more, pay me $2 and I will return you $1.40. CRAP.
The only good news is, due to the higher IR for the first 60k in your account, you get more money. Not a lot, but definitely more. Current rates keep you going to 85. With the increases, projected sum will keep you going till aged 89.
How many will live to 89? But that is okay, CPF can still be handed down to your family.
BUT…
89. Do we still need annuities?
This sounds like a con job. But I will hold that conclusion till details are released. Even then, we don’t have a choice do we? Mandatory participation, or you can renounce your citizenship. Everytime something advances 1 step, we go 2 steps behind.