Is CPF a golden egg nest?
Sep 26, 2007 in My Shout Outs
The CPF debate is still ongoing. Recently people are made more aware of the consequence of relying on CPF payouts after retirement. With just the minimum sum, for a 20 year pay out, you get around $300 a month only. Is that enough? With the minimum sum going up as the years go by to cover inflation, my question is, if $300 is not enough today, will it be enough in 20 or 40 years? If I had to rely on that 300, it would be a rather sad case isn’t it. On the contrary, if I didn’t have the bother about the money at all (ie, I can do away with the $300 a month payout), then the CPF scheme did not really work for me did it?
I do think as medicine advances further, we may be able to live longer. Or maybe with technology we will all die from cellular radiation or toxic smoke from factories and vehicles way before our ‘time’. As it is, many have benefited from CPF as a dependent when their parents/aunt etc, passes away. I benefited from it myself when my aunt died of cancer and it helped pay my education and stuff. Is the CPF scheme better, or is a pension scheme better? Today, I have no qualms about using my CPF for my housing loans. Just a few months ago I said let us not use the CPF for loans, simply because while I am still actively working, I should pay off loans with my salary. The CPF was for retirement and I didn’t want an empty nest egg. Looking deeper, how many eggs are there in this nest anyway? Not a lot. And with the government giving an additional % point for the first 60k, does it make sense in trying to keep my CPF holdings within that range? It is not hard to achieve 60k short term, and it is not hard to ensure my CPF doesn’t go beyond 60k. A housing loan makes all the difference. So which is better, CPF or a pension scheme? If I had to choose one out of the 2, I would pick CPF. There is no right or wrong really and every country has its own culture. Some feel that I have worked hard my whole life, and paid high taxes to support the retired and disadvantaged, hence when it is time for me to retire I should get my ‘rewards’ too. And that is a form of a nest egg, that the state will ensure you won’t go hungry. However if you were a talented person, would you want to give away 30% of your monthly salary to the state? I mean look at it this way, why do I need to share 30% of my talent and my money with the state even though I get benefits and pension (not everyone)? So the government says, you work for your own retirement. You put in the effort and we’ll help you. I think this is good and it is a lot fairer in the sense that you reap what you sow. For the minority who sowed a whole lot but reaped nothing, the state will take care of these exceptional cases. The term ‘financial freedom’ is a big term with many different definition. Some say financial freedom is not having any loans. My take is, financial freedom is the day when you don’t wait for your paycheck to arrive. ie you know money is flowing in and you don’t really care when it does come in. That is freedom. Income can be active or passive. A good retirement plan is not just CPF or annuities. A good plan should include passive income, eg rental from a property you own. When I am 65, and say I own 2 private apartments that I bought in 2010 for say a total of 3 million. When I turn 65, chances are it has gone way past 3 million. 10 million? 20 million? Goodness knows. By then it should be fully paid up, and the rental I get from the property is like money falling from the sky. Sorta like dividends from a stock counter. Sorta like keeping a hen for its eggs. Till one day you deicde you want to kill the golden hen for ‘all’ the eggs inside (you sell both property and cash out) only then will passive income cease. However humans being humans, chances are your property will outlive you somehow. So your desendants gets the ‘golden hen’ instead.
Whichever way it goes, you want to ensure your retirement is a golden phase in life, and not having to work because you have to else you starve. You may work because you feel like it, not because you have to. And that is what I want to. The reality is, when you are a student, you do not see all these. I didn’t. When you begin to work, you realise the true value of your work is not in your salary. You can work as a prostitute for a quicker buck but how long is that going to last? What you are working for is what your experience is worth in the end. If you ask yourself, heck, my work experience is not going to gain me much anytime soon nor in the foreseeable future, then perhaps you are not in the right job. And yes, the earlier you start (can be as early as your first pay check), the more time you have to grow your portfolio, and the more risk you can take in your investments. So you can still buy that gucci bag or that prada wallet and still save. But if you’re in your 40s and only then do you begin saving, do you think you can get the gucci bag still?
Time is money. And while money is not everything, it is everything that is not everything. My own quote.
They say money is the root of all evil. I say that is rubbish. The lack of money is the root of all evil. And yes you can be worth 1 billion bucks and stll feel you lack money. GREED.


